July 22, 2019

Donors’ Influence Over Our Leaders Persists Because Citizens Are Powerless


Trustworthy and indepth news stories are more important now than ever.
Support our newsroom by MAKING A CONTRIBUTION HERE
The New Times has picked on The Chronicles and Dr Kayumba Christopher as its latest target in its openly anti-Uganda campaign

As media reported about two weeks ago, Angola’s President hosted a “Quadripartite Summit” that included Presidents Paul Kagame, Yoweri Museveni of Uganda and DRC’s Félix Tshisekedi.

Among other things, the summit discussed the Rwanda-Uganda conflict and a communique after the meeting said Presidents Kagame and Museveni had agreed to “continue dialogue” under the mediation of President João Lourenço of Angola assisted by DRC’s Tshisekedi.

After the summit, I wrote an opinion piece in The Chronicles suggesting that the “Kagame-Museveni Peace Talks Can Only Bear Fruits If Ordered By Donor”!

Following this analysis, some government spokespersons in Kigali accused me of having “confidence” in donors as “solution” bearers and “alluding to more advanced peacemaking technical abilities from the donors”, as Dr. Jean-Paul Kimonyo, a senior presidential adviser put it on twitter.

Others claimed I was “undermining” the Angolan initiative and the idea of “African solutions to Africa’s problem” advocated by the continent’s leaders.

This Monday, July 22, my friend, Dr Lonzen Rugira suggested in an opinion in The New Times newspaper that I sought to “pour(s) cold water on any likelihood that a resolution of the crisis is possible without the threat of sanctions by donors against Presidents Kagame and Museveni”.

Last week, on July 16, an editorial in The New Times also accused me of believing “that Africa’s fate depends on “aid” that if donors cut off aid then everything will fall back in place?”

In truth however, I neither suggested that donors have solutions nor superior peacemaking skills. Nor do I believe they have any superior intellectual or human qualities than Africans. These qualities have no race or tribe.

Those who accuse me of favouring “donor solutions” only imagined it or are simply unhappy that I pointed out that due to “donor money” which our leaders always seek, and donors’ willingness to use it to extract concessions, makes the latter more powerful constituency than any local ones, that once they determine, compel conflict parties to take positions they wouldn’t otherwise take.

In comparison, I argued that while “donors” are willing to use their relative power to change positions of protagonists to conflicts, where Africa’s leaders have mediated, they are normally afraid or unwilling to speak truth to their own or sanction them when they renege on peace as the Burundi case illustrates.

My central point though was that while the Angola-DRC mediation is a good initiative, Presidents Lourenço and Tshisekedi not only lack the experience and clout to mediate the two experienced Military Generals, but also lack the requisite incentives needed to compel protagonists to change their positions.

At this point, I reminded that Rwanda’s position is that Uganda should stop support to dissidents and rebel groups; end economic sabotage and arresting Rwandans in Uganda.

On the other hand, Uganda says it neither supports dissidents seeking to fight Rwanda nor sabotages its economy and says the arrest of some Rwandans in Uganda is a “small matter” being resolved by the two states.

Analytically though, there is evidence to support Rwanda’s case and its leader has decided to search for peaceful solutions to the conflict to protect his Pan-African reformist agenda while, it seems, to remain relevant, President Museveni has settled on seeking influence through rebel groups; a strategy he has maintained since taking power in 1986.

Because the conflict involves support to rebels seeking to topple an elected government; Rwanda takes it as a serious threat and its unclear how Uganda’s position of denial can be changed without disincentives.

In that sense therefore, because donors, unlike Africa’s leaders, are normally willing to use their relative power─especially the power of the purse as an incentive and a disincentive, and because our leaders seem to crave this money, they usually cave when donors threaten withholding or cutting aid.

That’s what my critics don’t understand or fail to address! That Africa’s leaders have, in the past shown themselves to listen more to donors than their own!

Objectively though, while one can hate the fact that donors meddle in our local affairs and have disproportionate influence over our leaders than we do, it’s disingenuous for anyone to deny this reality or pretend it doesn’t exist as some government spokespeople do.

This donor influence is not only observable in spaces of power where leaders interact with them but is also prevalent in almost all major government policies─from poverty reduction strategies (advanced by Briton woods institutions), to education, etc.

I have also personally physically observed, over the years, both through work related engagements and in social settings the unequal relationship between donors and some of our leaders.

While for example some leaders or politician treat ordinary citizens as less equal to them in the way they talk to them, the same leaders treat whatever “Mzungu” they meet as if he or she was more superior. This is observable in the way they talk to each other and relate.

In part, that’s why whether its politicians in government or in opposition, when they get in trouble with their own government, they often run to the “donors” for protection than anywhere else. No?

Despite the rhetoric by leaders in either countries in the conflict therefore, I would even say that donors are a bigger counter-power to the ruling party in either polity than any other local constituency─except the military.

And in matters foreign policy, local constituents have almost zero influence on the president. In part, that’s why the Rwanda-Uganda conflict persists despite hurting many ordinary citizens.

And the main reason donors retain relative effective power over our leaders isn’t only because of their money our governments need nor is it because our leaders depend on donor countries’ hospitals for their and their families treatment, and would hate to be sanctioned.

Nor is it because our leaders and their families depend on donor countries’ shops to buy expensive cars, purchase sharp suits and other “good” things in life to quench their thirst, and would hate to lose visa privileges through sanctions.

The reason donors still occupy a central position in influencing our leaders is because our citizens are still voiceless and powerless to influence the decisions of their presidents─especially in matters of foreign policy.

In both countries, citizens are often referred to by their leaders as “illiterate” and “backward” and therefore need to be “civilized” by government.

Apart from citizens, even other interest groups─like the business community, civil society and the media are too weak and disorganized to affect presidential policies.

In other words, I’m addressing our world as it is and how decisions are taken in real life while my critics are addressing our world as it should be! An aspiration to determine our affairs without foreign influence─we will get there but we aren’t yet there.

Thus, donors will only lose their influence once citizens become effective influencers of presidential actions and policies.

And that won’t come until the vote is truly free and national bills paid by citizens; NOT donors.

NB: Kagame’s path: Pan-African reformist who wants this conflict to end peacefully and Museveni who appears to want to remain relevant through support to dissidents and armed groups.

We can't do quality journalism without your support

Perhaps it goes without saying — but producing quality journalism isn't cheap. At a time when newsroom resources and revenue are declining, The Chronicles remains committed to "Serving Your Right To Know The Truth". Stand with us as we document Rwanda's remarkable journey for you and the future generation. Do you value our journalism? We can't do it without you. Show us with your support by CONTRIBUTING HERE.
Email your news TIPS to info@chronicles.rw or WhatsApp +250788351327.
You can also find us on Signal

78 Comments

  1. Hello brother,
    The issue between Rwanda and Uganda is hurting ordinary people than the two presidents. I think that president Museven knows the truth about these problems and has all means to solve them without shouting any bullet. He knows the genesis of that sag and in fact he’s the trouble causer. How can a president accept that his security be infected by hooligans and cause such havoc? As for the solution to this problem, only if president Museven stops to try to dictate issues in Kigali and see the leadership in Kigali as equals, then everything will go well.

  2. Thank you Christopher for this wise analysis. Could u also analyse on how CLINGING ON POWER “irrigates” the fruit of conflict between countries. I say this out the following question;

    Had it been that Angola’s and Congo’s presidents by 2,000 are still in power, would the two countries be playing this mediation role between Uganda and Rwanda? For those of u who can remember the time TZ and Rwanda were at the point of checking the muscles of their arsenals would ask your selves how it ended! was it by mediation? Had it been that Kikwete was still power up to date, what would be situation to day?

  3. My brother suggested I might like this website. He was totally right.
    This submit actually made my day. You can not believe just how a lot time I
    had spent for this information! Thank you!

  4. We stumbled over here different page and thought
    I might check things out. I like what I see so now i’m following you.
    Look forward to looking into your web page again.

  5. I wass curious if you ever thought of chaning the page layout
    of your website? Its very well written; I love what youve got to say.

    But maybe you could a little more in thee way oof content
    so people could connect wijth it better. Youve got an awful lot oof tewxt for only having one or two pictures.
    Maybe you could space it out better?

    my web-site – 대출정보

  6. When I initially commented I clicked the “Notify me when new comments are added” checkbox and now each time a comment is
    added I get several e-mails with the same comment.

    Is there any way you can remove people from that service?
    Thanks a lot!

  7. Howdy, i read your blog from time to time and i own a similar one
    and i was just wondering if you get a lot of spam comments?
    If so how do you reduce it, any plugin or anything you can suggest?
    I get so much lately it’s driving me insane
    so any help is very much appreciated.

  8. Hey there! This is my first visit to your blog! We are a group of volunteers and starting a new project in a community in the
    same niche. Your blog provided us valuable information to work on. You have done a wonderful
    job!

  9. You can certainly see your expertise in the work you write.
    The world hopes for more passionate writers such as you who are not afraid to say how they believe.
    All the time go after your heart.

  10. I’m not sure exactly why but this blog is loading extremely slow for
    me. Is anyone else having this issue or is it a issue on my
    end? I’ll check back later on and see if the problem still exists.

  11. Hello I am so glad I found your weblog, I really
    found you by error, while I was researching on Google for something else, Anyhow I am
    here now and would just like to say many thanks for a incredible post and a all round exciting blog (I
    also love the theme/design), I don’t have time to read it all at the minute but I have book-marked it and also added in your RSS feeds, so when I have time I will be back to
    read a great deal more, Please do keep up the great
    b.

  12. Hi there, I found your website by way of Google whilst searching for a similar matter, your web site got here up,
    it looks good. I have bookmarked it in my google bookmarks.

    Hi there, just changed into alert to your blog via Google,
    and found that it is really informative. I am going to be careful for brussels.

    I’ll appreciate in case you proceed this in future. Many other people will be benefited
    from your writing. Cheers!

  13. With havin so much content and articles do you ever run into any issues of plagorism or
    copyright infringement? My website has a lot of completely unique content I’ve either created myself or outsourced but it seems a lot of it is popping it up all over the internet
    without my authorization. Do you know any solutions
    to help prevent content from being stolen? I’d genuinely appreciate it.

  14. We’re a group of volunteers and opening a new scheme in our community.
    Your site offered us with valuable info to work on. You’ve done a formidable job and our entire community will be grateful to you.

  15. Thіs design is incredible!Үou defіnitely know hoԝ to kеep a reader entertained.
    Ᏼetween your wit аnd yⲟur videos, I wɑs
    ɑlmost moved tⲟ start mү own blog (weⅼl, almost…HaHa!)
    Greаt job. I really loved what yyou had tօ saу, and morе than that, hоw yoս
    presented іt. Toο cool!

    Feel free to surf to my blog post: wardrobe furniture

  16. you’re actually a just right webmaster. The site loading pace is incredible.
    It seems that you are doing any distinctive trick.

    In addition, The contents are masterwork. you have done a wonderful activity on this topic!

  17. It’s a shame you don’t have a donate button! I’d without a doubt donate to this
    excellent blog! I suppose for now i’ll settle for book-marking and adding your RSS feed to my
    Google account. I look forward to fresh updates and will share this blog with my Facebook group.
    Talk soon!

  18. Hmm it seems like your site ate my first comment (it was extremely long) so I guess I’ll just sum
    it up what I wrote and say, I’m thoroughly enjoying your blog.
    I too am an aspiring blog writer but I’m still new
    to the whole thing. Do you have any tips for first-time blog
    writers? I’d definitely appreciate it.

    Here is my website … painter

  19. I think this is among the most important info for me. And i am glad reading your article.
    But wanna remark on some general things, The site
    style is great, the articles is really great : D. Good job, cheers

  20. Excellent post. I was checking constantly this blog and I’m impressed!
    Extremely useful info specifically the last part 🙂 I care for such information much.
    I was looking for this certain info for a long time.
    Thank you and best of luck.

  21. 로즈카지노는 온라인 카지노 중 하나로, 다양한 카지노 게임을 제공하는 사이트입니다. 주로 슬롯머신, 블랙잭, 바카라, 룰렛 등의 게임을 플레이할 수 있으며, 사용자들은 실제 돈을 걸고 게임을 즐길 수 있습니다. 로즈카지노는 다양한 보너스나 이벤트를 통해 사용자들에게 혜택을 주기도 합니다. 사용자 경험과 안전을 중요시 여기며 다양한 게임과 서비스를 제공하는 것이 특징입니다. 다만, 온라인 도박은 법적인 제약이 있는 경우도 있으므로 해당 지역의 법규를 확인하는 것이 중요합니다.

  22. After I originally commented I seem to have clicked
    on the -Notify me when new comments are added- checkbox and from now on every time a comment is added
    I receive four emails with the same comment. Perhaps there is a means you are able to remove me from
    that service? Thank you!

  23. Thanks , I have recently been looking for info about
    this subject for a while and yours is the greatest I’ve found out till now.
    However, what about the bottom line? Are you certain about the source?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *