May 27, 2020

Understanding UK-US “Explanation of Positions (EOPs)” on the 1994 Genocide

Trustworthy and indepth news stories are more important now than ever.
Support our newsroom by MAKING A CONTRIBUTION HERE
President Paul Kagame joined the UN Secretary General António Guterres inside the General Assembly Hall April 12, 2019 for the commemoration of the “International Day of Reflection on the 1994 Genocide against the Tutsi in Rwanda”

If anyone is celebrating the two letters that have been published outlining US and UK opposition to the appellation of the 1994 genocide against the Tutsi, not so quickly. The details of what happened at the UN headquarters between March and April tell a different story.

The United States and the United Kingdom, have for the first time gone on record, disagreeing with the Government of Rwanda on what to call the catastrophic events of 1994. The questions on everyone’s mind today are; what happened that led US-UK letters to come out? Have the two changed policy on Rwanda? What happens going forward?

First, here are the facts so far. In March, Rwanda together with close ally Qatar and two other nations, formulated a new UN resolution to back up, or even replace the one adopted by the UN General Assembly in April 2018. The resolution put end to a sometimes dirty global debate.

The genocide in Rwanda was called what it ought to be; ‘the 1994 genocide against the Tutsi’ and April 7, became the “International Day of Reflection on the 1994 Genocide against the Tutsi in Rwanda”. It became illegal under international law to negate the genocide with any other demeaning language.

Fast forward to March 2020, and Rwanda was not satisfied with the contents of the 2018 UN resolution. It partnered up with key ally Qatar, Argentina, The Gambia and another key ally Norway for a modification of the existing text. The new new draft required the UN to help the survivors, among other demands.

The new draft resolution also sought to require the UN Secretary General “to modify the title of the outreach programme to “outreach programme on the 1994 genocide against the Tutsi in Rwanda and the United Nations” and to take measures to mobilize civil society for remembrance and education in the context of the International Day of Reflection on the 1994 Genocide against the Tutsi in Rwanda, in order to help to prevent future acts of genocide, and to report annually to the General Assembly on the implementation of the programme.”

With its text ready in early March, Rwanda’s UN envoy Valentine Rugwabiza shared it with UN General Assemby President for circulation. And then the highly secret closed door negotiations began among members on the spirit and wording of the new draft resolution.

We will never know who said what exactly to Rwanda and its allies. But somehow the United States and United Kingdom, separately unable to have their modifications reflectedideas in the draft text, decided to go public with their concerns.

The Chronicles understands that the US and UK felt that contrary to the conventional mechanism within the UN which gives plenty of time for extensive talks on a draft resolution, that is not what happened with the Rwanda draft.

The 2018 resolution was in the works for over five years, right from the time Rwanda took up its seat in the UN Security Council 20136. This was the timeframe within which the new terminology of the genocide became a serious issue for Rwanda.

From 1994 up until the early 2000s, according to various accounts, President Kagame’s government was OK with the “Rwandan genocide” appellation as the specific terminology seems not to have been really important at the timeit accommodated other peoples of Rwandan society killed during the genocide. However, the genocide negationist machinery took advantage of the language loophole, and was getting ever more powerful. And one incident convinced Kigali that something had to be done, and fast!

On October 1, 2014, the British broadcaster BBC aired a highly controversial documentary ‘Rwanda’s Untold Story’. Based on interviews with Rwandan dissidents in South Africa, Europe and US, the documentary questioned the number of genocide victims. It actually suggested that far more Hutus were killed than Tutsis.

The 1hr project alleged that the RPF rebels, on orders of leader Gen Paul Kagame, killed thousands of Hutu people in deliberate policy. After all was done and dusted in Rwanda, according to the BBC documentary, the RPF moved to Zaire (now DR Congo) to pursue the Rwandan refugees there.

Based on the personal story of Marie Bamutese, a Rwandan woman married to Flemish journalist Peter Verlinden, the BBC claimed the war in Congo had killed more than 5m people. The allegations in the documentary were outrageous, but since it had been watched by millions globally, it became the point of reference about Rwanda, President Kagame and the RPF.

In Kigali, the system went into action. Various things happened, including the banning of the BBC greatlakes service which aired in Kinyarwanda language on FM. Parliament even issued resolution condemning the BBC, a rare feat. President Kagame himself made a very strongly worded speech at some point.

From then on, Kagame and his team new something had to be done to shape the narrative history of Rwanda. That was to remove all ambiguity on what really happened in Rwanda between April 7, 1994 to July 17, the same year. The Apocalypse of the time had to be called with the exact terminology. Plenty happened, between the BBC documentary and the 2018 UN resolution.

Actually, in Kinyarwanda language up until the terminology changed, the genocide was called ‘Itsembabwoko n’itsembatsemba’ literary translated as ‘the genocide and massacres’. From around 2011, government began pushing through modifications in the legal regime in Rwanda, and specific wording to “Jenoside yakorewe abatutsi mu 1994” (which is exactly what was adopted by the UN in English translation).

Back to the new draft resolution which Rwanda and its allies had put forward this past March, it was in the works for less than a month. For such a fundamental issue, perhaps some key UN diplomats felt they were not getting as much time.

Within days, a new resolution was already done. The Americans and the British, unable to push anything through, because the Rwandan government had mobilised the entire UN General Assembly, decided to file what is called “Explanation of Position” (EoP).

First, both US and UK wanted the terminology of the text to be broadened to make it more inclusive, changed from “the 1994 genocide against the Tutsi”, to reflect “other” Rwandans also killed. The Americans accused Rwanda of forcing through the resolution without sufficient consultation. Washington also talks about freedom of speech.

Under normal circumstances, the Americans and British would have had their positions adapted in the text, somehow, since they are key political backers and funders of Kigali. But unable to do so, Washington and London, opted for the highway; write their Positions for the public record. The UN resolution passed anyway. However, it will always be accompanied by the two letters of the UK and US.

Make no mistake though about the Explanation of Position from UK and US. It DOES NOT mean there is a change of policy by London and Washington on the genocide. The two letters clearly state the genocide was planned to kill Tutsis. It doesn’t also mean that the UK and US are negating or denying that the genocide targeted Tutsis. What the UK and US are trying to do was to ensure the non-Tutsi victims are also recognized as the Americans and British view this as key to national reconciliation and healing in Rwanda.

US policy, and with it the politico-economic support remains in place going forward. The same is with the UK. Only that this time, Kigali knows there is an elephant in the room.

The Americans and British sseem to beay they have been adamant to accept any literature in international archives which doesn’t highlight the fact that Hutus killed need to be recognized. The difference this time with their Explanation of Position, is that their positions have now been added onto the public global narrative about Rwanda.

With these new developments, the negationist platform has never been this emboldened. The UK-US public outbursts have come like manna from heaven for the genocide denial movement.

Important to note is that, even though UN General Assembly resolutions are not legally binding on member states, there is a real and persuasive point in having these resolutions.. Most experts agree that the resolutions weigh significantly on global politics. The resolutions have a significant effect in world politics it is due to their political influence rather than to the legal obligations that they carry.

Indeed, the mere existence of these resolutions can be used by member States as an instrument of persuasion or a point of reference to substantiate their claims. Some major resolutions have been transformed into a new legal norm or used as reference in settling international law cases.

As The Chronicles wrote earlier, a big Pandora’s box has been opened with the UK-US public positions.

We can't do quality journalism without your support

Perhaps it goes without saying — but producing quality journalism isn't cheap. At a time when newsroom resources and revenue are declining, The Chronicles remains committed to "Serving Your Right To Know The Truth". Stand with us as we document Rwanda's remarkable journey for you and the future generation. Do you value our journalism? We can't do it without you. Show us with your support by CONTRIBUTING HERE.
Email your news TIPS to or WhatsApp +250788351327.
You can also find us on Signal


  1. Hey! Would you mind if I share your blog with my facebook group?
    There’s a lot of folks that I think would really appreciate your content.
    Please let me know. Thank you

  2. Hmm it seems like your site ate my first comment (it was super long)
    so I guess I’ll just sum it up what I had written and
    say, I’m thoroughly enjoying your blog. I too am an aspiring blog writer but I’m still new to the whole thing.
    Do you have any tips for novice blog writers? I’d really appreciate it.

  3. I think that is one of the most important information for me.
    And i am satisfied reading your article. But wanna commentary on some basic issues, The web site taste is perfect, the articles is truly nice : D.
    Good activity, cheers

  4. I am not sure where you are getting your information, but great topic.
    I needs to spend some time learning much more or understanding more.

    Thanks for excellent information I was looking for this information for my mission.

  5. Woah! I’m really loving the template/theme of this website.
    It’s simple, yet effective. A lot of times it’s hard to get that “perfect balance” between user
    friendliness and visual appearance. I must say that you’ve done a awesome job with this.
    In addition, the blog loads super fast for me on Safari.
    Superb Blog!

  6. Thank you for the auspicious writeup. It in fact was a entertainment account it.
    Glance advanced to far brought agreeable from you! However, how could we keep up a

  7. Some chiropractors have embraced vaccination,
    but a significant portion of the profession rejects it, as original chiropractic philosophy
    traces diseases to causes in the spine and states that vaccines interfere
    with healing.

  8. After looking at a number of the blog posts on your website,
    I really appreciate your way of blogging. I book-marked it
    to my bookmark website list and will be checking
    back soon. Please visit my website too and let me know
    your opinion.

  9. I believe what you said made a lot of sense. But, what about
    this? what if you added a little information? I mean, I don’t want
    to tell you how to run your blog, but what if you added a title that makes
    people desire more? I mean Understanding UK-US “Explanation of Positions (EOPs)” on the
    1994 Genocide – THE CHRONICLES is a
    little plain. You should look at Yahoo’s front page and
    note how they create article titles to get people
    interested. You might add a related video or a related picture or two to grab people interested about everything’ve
    got to say. Just my opinion, it would bring your posts a little livelier.

  10. Greetings! Very helpful advice in this particular post! It is the little changes that will make the most significant changes. Many thanks for sharing!

  11. Have you ever thought about adding a little bit more than just your articles?
    I mean, what you say is important and all. But think about if
    you added some great visuals or video clips to give your posts more, “pop”!
    Your content is excellent but with pics and clips, this site could undeniably be one of the best in its field.

    Wonderful blog!

  12. This is really attention-grabbing, You’re an overly skilled blogger.

    I have joined your rss feed and stay up for in quest of
    extra of your fantastic post. Also, I’ve shared your site in my social

  13. Hi! I could have sworn I’ve been to this web site before but after going through many of
    the posts I realized it’s new to me. Nonetheless, I’m
    certainly happy I came across it and I’ll be book-marking it and checking back regularly!

  14. An impressive share! I’ve just forwarded this onto a coworker who had been doing a little homework on this. And he actually bought me breakfast simply because I stumbled upon it for him… lol. So allow me to reword this…. Thank YOU for the meal!! But yeah, thanks for spending some time to talk about this subject here on your website.

  15. Your style is unique compared to other people I have read stuff from. Thanks for posting when you’ve got the opportunity, Guess I will just bookmark this blog.

  16. Next time I read a blog, I hope that it won’t fail me just as much as this particular one. After all, I know it was my choice to read, but I really believed you would have something helpful to say. All I hear is a bunch of complaining about something you can fix if you were not too busy seeking attention.

  17. Write more, thats all I have to say. Literally, it seems as though you relied on the video to make your point.
    You obviously know what youre talking about, why throw away
    your intelligence on just posting videos to your weblog when you could be giving us
    something informative to read?

  18. Howdy! I know this is kinda off topic but I was wondering which blog platform
    are you using for this website? I’m getting fed up of WordPress because I’ve had problems with hackers
    and I’m looking at alternatives for another platform. I
    would be great if you could point me in the direction of a good platform.

  19. When I initially commented I appear to have clicked the -Notify me when new comments are added- checkbox and now every time a comment is added I receive 4 emails with the same comment. There has to be a way you are able to remove me from that service? Thanks a lot!

  20. Hi! I could have sworn I’ve visited this blog before but after going through many of the posts I realized it’s new to me. Nonetheless, I’m certainly happy I came across it and I’ll be bookmarking it and checking back frequently!

  21. Can I simply just say what a relief to find somebody that truly knows what they’re talking about on the web. You actually understand how to bring a problem to light and make it important. More and more people ought to read this and understand this side of your story. I was surprised that you are not more popular because you definitely possess the gift.

  22. That is a great tip particularly to those new to the blogosphere. Short but very accurate info… Thanks for sharing this one. A must read article!

  23. Hello! I could have sworn I’ve visited your blog before but after looking at a few of the posts I realized it’s new to me. Regardless, I’m definitely pleased I discovered it and I’ll be book-marking it and checking back frequently!

  24. I was excited to discover this web site. I wanted to thank you for your time for this particularly fantastic read!! I definitely enjoyed every little bit of it and I have you saved as a favorite to check out new stuff on your blog.

  25. I blog frequently and I seriously appreciate your information. This article has really peaked my interest. I’m going to bookmark your site and keep checking for new information about once a week. I opted in for your Feed too.

  26. You are so cool! I don’t suppose I’ve read a single thing like that before. So nice to discover someone with original thoughts on this issue. Really.. thanks for starting this up. This website is one thing that’s needed on the internet, someone with a little originality!

  27. Hey there! This is my first visit to your blog! We are a collection of volunteers and starting a
    new project in a community in the same niche.
    Your blog provided us valuable information to work
    on. You have done a wonderful job!

  28. I blog often and I seriously thank you for your information. The article has really peaked my interest.
    I am going to take a note of your website and keep checking for new information about
    once per week. I subscribed to your RSS feed too.

    Have a look at my homepage … 먹튀검증

  29. Your style is very unique compared to other folks I have read stuff from. I appreciate you for posting when you’ve got the opportunity, Guess I’ll just bookmark this blog.

  30. A fascinating discussion is worth comment. I do believe that you should write more about this subject, it might not be a taboo matter but usually people don’t discuss these issues. To the next! Best wishes!!

  31. I really love your blog.. Pleasant colors & theme. Did you make this site yourself? Please reply back as I’m planning to create my very own blog and would love to learn where you got this from or just what the theme is named. Thanks!

  32. After checking out a number of the blog posts on your web page, I seriously appreciate your way of blogging. I saved as a favorite it to my bookmark webpage list and will be checking back soon. Take a look at my website as well and let me know what you think.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *